ࡱ> v|{(/( / 00DArialngs}0z[ 0DGaramond}0z[ 0 DTimes New Roman0z[ 00DWingdingsRoman0z[ 0 A .  @n?" dd@  @@`` pN () ()** 5    HHABDL M\ ]^_`a hijlop 0AA@823S ʚ;Vu8ʚ;g4EdEd z[ 0ppp@ <4ddddL 0| <4BdBdL< 0<4!d!dL< 080___PPT10 ?  %&CInstitutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPsDD0_Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASH KMD Project ϡȱ January 25, 2010`P`CASH Project Background(USM s history of system-level involvement in STEM education and P-20 partnership work CASH funded as a KMD project, supplement to VIP K-16 Targeted MSP Study the key feature of institutional change and sustainability among higher education institutions with MSPs   $ !Overarching Questions(What can we learn about MSP-supported changes that have expanded institutional capacity to support the reform of P-20 STEM education and the meaningful engagement of faculty in this enterprise? What strategies are MSP institutions using to sustain these developments over time? $'Assumptions About Institutional Change(((/Change in higher education requires more than top down leadership Grassroots leadership (faculty, administrative) may require support from top down leaders Institutional culture shapes change processes and leadership Change processes may also require change in institutional culture to be sustainable ,.ZZ.CASH Project Components(UAnalysis of MSP project-related data, including annual reports, evaluation reports, and submissions to the MSP management information system Analysis of new programs, courses, and curricula generated by MSP projects Documentation at national meetings of participating STEM faculty Six MSP project site visits External national advisory boardVV  &Analysis of Data from MSP Site Visits''(#Data sources: interview notes and transcripts, project artifacts (e.g., annual reports, project-related publications) Formed descriptive categories for the data, aligned with our research questions, and tracked emerging themes across various data sources Within-case and cross-case analysesCategories of CASH FindingsBBackdrop of Institutional Culture/Context Role of MSP Project Leaders Impact of Institutional Leadership/Support Investment/Motivation of Participating Faculty Structural Changes that Supported and/or Resulted from MSP Work Course/Curricular Changes that Supported and/or Resulted from MSP Work Question of Sustainability CC'$For DiscussionMSP as an Institutional Priority 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Low High Types of Faculty Engagement in MSP 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Outreach/Service Scholarship MSP Sustainability (Institutional/Partnership) 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Unlikely Likely !J#^0Q!I#^0P"Lessons LearnedLeadership Matters: Critical roles of provosts, deans, and department chairs Need for both bottom-up faculty leadership and top-down advocacy and support Importance of recognition and rewards New Structures: Boundary spanning positions (e.g., joint faculty appointments, education appointments in STEM departments and vice versa) Role of administrative faculty/staff Creation of multi-disciplinary STEM centers and/or partnership outreach units `ZZZZ#Lessons LearnedNClosing the Loop: Challenges to connecting MSP to the core educational mission of the institution Undergraduate education reform in STEM as a by-product of involvement in K-12 Investment in P-20 STEM pipeline is in the interest of the institution New directions for research, scholarship, and substantive faculty work in these areas(==!Lessons LearnedSustainability: Tangible outcomes: new courses and programs for in-service and pre-service K-12 teachers, reformed undergraduate courses, creation of campus centers or outreach units, and in a few cases, commitment to new faculty lines Concerns about maintaining viability of the above in the absence of ongoing incentives/support for participating faculty, teachers, and students Frequent succession plan was to secure additional external funding 4 RecommendationsNSF should & Continue to fund a diversity of institutional types Consider expanding PI eligibility outside of STEM faculty Help projects engage in sustainability planning on the front end of the grant award Explicitly link the scholarship of teaching and learning to MSP work in the design of MSP projects Claim ownership for the preparation and professional development of STEM teachers Continue to invest in the MSP knowledge dissemination network $ZZRecommendationsCollege and university leaders should & Make a concerted effort to know about MSP work on their campus and publicly recognize those faculty involved in it Ensure that STEM teaching and learning is a priority in the institutional strategic plan Position the preparation of K-12 teachers and support for K-12 education reform as a cross-campus responsibility H)Z>ZZZh(%Recommendations@College and university leaders should & Recognize the importance of their role in facilitating cross-disciplinary collaboration and their support of policies and structures that can sustain this work over time Create opportunities for career advancement and expanded leadership capacity among non tenure-track faculty, adjunct faculty, and non-faculty academic administrators who are proactively working with MSP .)ZxZRecommendations Higher education faculty and disciplinary societies should & Continue to seek and value linkages to the scholarship of teaching and learning within STEM disciplines Continue to build on the important service and outreach components of faculty work in MSP R?PPPPFor DiscussionWhere should a report like this go? How could these recommendations be moved forward in a way that they could have an impact on your campus? Are there other potential audiences for these recommendations? x$PPkPPAPPP c ` 3` ff>>\fg` J*T333` QYmx~3ft` \ғhEy`` cb^DDf`Y˵W` sg7xGr` K%ޯd{mG/` 33f>?" dd@,?nFd@    @ `  n?" dd@   @@``PR    @ ` `<p>> P(    6P #" `b `  >*   6 #" `` `  @* xT ~  "~\ {  "{  c BB CDEFd @ bb   H   T W6Vw}\gFQ6<1++11 1L b6xQrq 6\}N   - c    0 A Q g     S    6N KawF bFy0 a*ly7lE;uz  B | a F 0 ! 1 < B < & l L 0  @`"T   c |BC+DEFyd @ ==gL6cI}\eA& w6m!W<! &<W!r6W}F6\}>68QNlX^XH8+Sgg|@`"Jo 5 J   B! CDEF @ ))\*l{FDNF W% W ! !   ! 6X L b x_ /aF6b}SA$|l\\TX@`s"*  T  u4   B C%DEF ss&QW}k6D Q r 8 N c t y y ;t Qi gS }8     T   :0\-Q4*%%v*o(V}5q;  S   < s } l \ g} \, L ;n &  Z}\[6 }WF<! e C }h m W ]  ,t B RxkqA,Rg@`" {b    BCDEFy @ ,,Lh6\}mWG &a*zCxsh-&jG]~5g6&LLZ\@`s"*   u(     BCDE|Fy @ __@% M|f4@{ f0`lA}L\A+h MB6ww FJl{ 0V|{J  *5KlGn a*:Pf\|6 /6Kbf|F kP}5x}VvaP@@@`s"*   =>    c BlCrDEF"d@ rlrl@`"~   6 " `}  T Click to edit Master title style! !  6 #" ``   @* $  0X " `  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     SB  s *޽h ? 3___PPT10i. u%.+D=' = @B +  Streamb 2 yq (  xT ~  "~\ {  "{  c BB CDEFd @ bb   H   T W6Vw}\gFQ6<1++11 1L b6xQrq 6\}N   - c    0 A Q g     S    6N KawF bFy0 a*ly7lE;uz  B | a F 0 ! 1 < B < & l L 0  @`"T   c |BC+DEFyd @ ==gL6cI}\eA& w6m!W<! &<W!r6W}F6\}>68QNlX^XH8+Sgg|@`"Jo 5 J   B! CDEF @ ))\*l{FDNF W% W ! !   ! 6X L b x_ /aF6b}SA$|l\\TX@`s"*  T  u4  B C%DEF ss&QW}k6D Q r 8 N c t y y ;t Qi gS }8     T   :0\-Q4*%%v*o(V}5q;  S   < s } l \ g} \, L ;n &  Z}\[6 }WF<! e C }h m W ]  ,t B RxkqA,Rg@`" {b   BCDEFy @ ,,Lh6\}mWG &a*zCxsh-&jG]~5g6&LLZ\@`s"*   u(     BCDE|Fy @ __@% M|f4@{ f0`lA}L\A+h MB6ww FJl{ 0V|{J  *5KlGn a*:Pf\|6 /6Kbf|F kP}5x}VvaP@@@`s"*   =>    c BlCrDEF"d@ rlrl@`"~   < "F   T Click to edit Master title style! !   0( " `    W#Click to edit Master subtitle style$ $   6t‰ #" `` `  >*   6ȉ #" `b   @*   6 ̉ #" `d `  @* B  s *޽h ? 3___PPT10i. u%.+D=' = @B +}3 @$(  r  S ։ z  r  S ׉  `   H  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.``.+D=' = @B + 2K0  0(  x  c $#  `}   x  c $$0 `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.`@29+D=' = @B + 2K0 <(  ~  s *  `}   ~  s *0 `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.`@29+D=' = @B + 2K0 t<(  t~ t s *:  `}   ~ t s *=P `s  H t 0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.`@29+D=' = @B + 2K0 p<(  p~ p s *lq  `}   ~ p s *,r `  H p 0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.`@29+D=' = @B +} 2 4$(  4r 4 S    `}   r 4 S  `  H 4 0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.` P]+D=' = @B + 2  l6(  lx l c $  `}   ~ l s *   H l 0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`W+D=' = @B + 2 6(  x  c $1  `}  1 ~  s *@1  1 H  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`W+D=' = @B + 2 6(  x  c $ܡ  `}   ~  s *   H  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`W+D=' = @B + 2 6(  x  c $  `}   ~  s *䴏   H  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`W+D=' = @B + 2 6(  x  c $  `}   ~  s *0   H  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`W+D=' = @B + 2  0*(  0x 0 c $\  `}   r  0 S 0 `  H 0 0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`[+D=' = @B + 2 xL(  x~ x s *   `}    x c $ `  "p`PpH x 0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`[+D=' = @B + 2 L(  ~  s *4  `}     c $m `  "p`PpH  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`[+D=' = @B + 2 |L(  |~ | s *  `}    | c $\ `  "p`PpH | 0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`[+D=' = @B + 2 L(  ~  s *l'  `}     c $P1 `  "p`PpH  0޽h ? 3___PPT10i.`[+D=' = @B +r`P0/Nlj ʆRw`ytqU\ @3o3' n|?  ((/( / 00DArialngs}0z[ 0DGaramond}0z[ 0 DTimes New Roman0z[ 00DWingdingsRomanOh+'0T hp    $,CASH Research QuestionsiJennifer FrankQStreamrJennifer FrankQ64nMicrosoft PowerPointons@V*[@`@`B1GSg  )'    """)))UUUMMMBBB999|PP3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3ff333f333333333f33333333f33f3ff3f3f3f3333f33̙33333f333333f3333f3ffffff3f33ff3f3f3f3fff3ffffffffff3ffff̙fff3fffff3fff333f3f3ff3ff33f̙̙3̙ff̙̙̙3f̙3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3f3f3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3f3ffffffffff!___www4'A x(xKʦ """)))UUUMMMBBB999|PP3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙f3333f3333333333f3333333f3f33ff3f3f3f3333f3333333f3̙33333f333ff3ffffff3f33f3ff3f3f3ffff3fffffffff3fffffff3f̙ffff3ff333f3ff33fff33f3ff̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff̙̙3̙f̙̙̙3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3ffffffffff!___wwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eeeeeeeeeeeee_eeeeee_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee􅦦eeeeeeeeeee_eeeeeeeeee_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_e_eeeeeee_ee_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eeee_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eee_e_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eeeeeeee_eee_eeeee_eeee_eeeeeeee_e_e_ee_e_eeee_eeeeeeee_eee_eeeee_eeeeeee_eeeeeeee_e_e_eee_e_eeeeeee_eeeee_e_eeeeeeeeee_ee_ee_e_e_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eeeee_e_eeeeeeeeee_ee_ee_e_e_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee_eeeee_eeeeeeeeee_eee_eee_eeeeee_eee_e_eeeee_eeee_eee_eeeee_eee_eeee_eeeee_eeeeeeeeee_eee_eee_eeeeee_eee_e_eeeee_eeee_eee_eee_e_eeee___eeee_ee_eeeee_ee_e_eeeee_e_eeeee_eeee_eeeee_e_ee_eeeeeeeeee_eee_eee_e_eeee___eeee_ee_eeeee_ee_e_eeeee_e_eeeee_eeeee_eee_e_eee_eee_e_eeeeeee_e_eeeeeee_ee_eeee_e_eeeee_eeee_ee_eee_eeeee_eee_ee_eeee_eee_e_eee_eee_e_eeeeeee_e_eeeeeee_ee_eeee_e_eeeee_eeee_ee_eeee_e_eee_e_e_eeeee_eeee_e_eeee__ee_ee_eeeee_e_eeee__eee_e_e_eeee_eeeee_eee_eee__ee_eeeee_e_eee_e_e_eeeee_eeee_e_eeee__ee_ee_eeeee_e_eeee__eee_e_e_eee___e_e_ee_eeee_e_B_eee_ee_ee__e__eeeeee_eee_e__eeeee_eeee_e_eeeeeee_e_eee_eeeB__ee__eee_eee___e_e_ee_eeee_e_B_eee_ee_ee__e__eeeeee_eee_e__eeeee_eeee_e_eeeeeee_eeBeeeBee_e_e__ee_ee_e_ee_e_eBeeeBee_e_eB_e_B_eeee_e__e_e_Bee_e__e_e_Be__ee_e_eee_eeBe_ee_e_eBeeeBee_e_e__ee_ee_e_ee_e_eBeeeBee_e_eB_e_B_eeee_e__e_e_Bee_e__e_e_Bee__e__e_BeBe_ee__eeBe_BeB_e__e_e_e_eB_ee?@ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstu~   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstu~ _aai NarayanParvathi Narayan _AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName layName 2Final Versions of PPTsjfrank@umsa.ums.eduJennifer Frankt BaDocumentSummaryInformation8} (_Parvathi NarayanParvathi Narayan  Dt_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName 2Final Versions of PPTsjfrank@umsa.ums.eduJennifer Frankt Ba՜.+,D՜.+,    ( :On-screen ShowϡȱusoA Arial GaramondTimes New Roman WingdingsStreamDInstitutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPsCASH Project BackgroundOverarching Questions(Assumptions About Institutional ChangeCASH Project Components'Analysis of Data from MSP Site VisitsCategories of CASH FindingsFor DiscussionLessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons LearnedRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsFor Discussion  Fonts UsedDesign Template Slide Titles (_Parvathi NarayanParvathi Narayan _AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName layName 2Final Versions of PPTsjfrank@umsa.ums.eduJennifer Frankt Ba  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvRoot EntrydO)01Current UserJSummaryInformation(K UPowerPoint Document(DocumentSummaryInformation80z[ 0 A .  @n?" dd@  @@`` pN () ()** 5    HHABDL M\ ]^_`a hijlop 0AA@823S ʚ;Vu8ʚ;g4EdEd z[ 0ppp@ <4ddddL 0| <4BdBdL< 0<4!d!dL< 080___PPT10 ?  %&CInstitutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPsDD0_Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASH KMD Project ϡȱ January 25, 2010`P`CASH Project Background(USM s history of system-level involvement in STEM education and P-20 partnership work CASH funded as a KMD project, supplement to VIP K-16 Targeted MSP Study the key feature of institutional change and sustainability among higher education institutions with MSPs   $ !Overarching Questions(What can we learn about MSP-supported changes that have expanded institutional capacity to support the reform of P-20 STEM education and the meaningful engagement of faculty in this enterprise? What strategies are MSP institutions using to sustain these developments over time? $'Assumptions About Institutional Change(((/Change in higher education requires more than top down leadership Grassroots leadership (faculty, administrative) may require support from top down leaders Institutional culture shapes change processes and leadership Change processes may also require change in institutional culture to be sustainable ,.ZZ.CASH Project Components(UAnalysis of MSP project-related data, including annual reports, evaluation reports, and submissions to the MSP management information system Analysis of new programs, courses, and curricula generated by MSP projects Documentation at national meetings of participating STEM faculty Six MSP project site visits External national advisory boardVV  &Analysis of Data from MSP Site Visits''(#Data sources: interview notes and transcripts, project artifacts (e.g., annual reports, project-related publications) Formed descriptive categories for the data, aligned with our research questions, and tracked emerging themes across various data sources Within-case and cross-case analysesCategories of CASH FindingsBBackdrop of Institutional Culture/Context Role of MSP Project Leaders Impact of Institutional Leadership/Support Investment/Motivation of Participating Faculty Structural Changes that Supported and/or Resulted from MSP Work Course/Curricular Changes that Supported and/or Resulted from MSP Work Question of Sustainability CC'$For DiscussionMSP as an Institutional Priority 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Low High Types of Faculty Engagement in MSP 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Outreach/Service Scholarship MSP Sustainability (Institutional/Partnership) 1 to 5 %_________________________________% Unlikely Likely !J#^0Q!I#^0P"Lessons LearnedLeadership Matters: Critical roles of provosts, deans, and department chairs Need for both bottom-up faculty leadership and top-down advocacy and support Importance of recognition and rewards New Structures: Boundary spanning positions (e.g., joint faculty appointments, education appointments in STEM departments and vice versa) Role of administrative faculty/staff Creation of multi-disciplinary STEM centers and/or partnership outreach units `ZZZZ#Lessons LearnedNClosing the Loop: Challenges to connecting MSP to the core educational mission of the institution Undergraduate education reform in STEM as a by-product of involvement in K-12 Investment in P-20 STEM pipeline is in the interest of the institution New directions for research, scholarship, and substantive faculty work in these areas(==!Lessons LearnedSustainability: Tangible outcomes: new courses and programs for in-service and pre-service K-12 teachers, reformed undergraduate courses, creation of campus centers or outreach units, and in a few cases, commitment to new faculty lines Concerns about maintaining viability of the above in the absence of ongoing incentives/support for participating faculty, teachers, and students Frequent succession plan was to secure additional external funding 4 RecommendationsNSF should & Continue to fund a diversity of institutional types Consider expanding PI eligibility outside of STEM faculty Help projects engage in sustainability planning on the front end of the grant award Explicitly link the scholarship of teaching and learning to MSP work in the design of MSP projects Claim ownership for the preparation and professional development of STEM teachers Continue to invest in the MSP knowledge dissemination network $ZZRecommendationsCollege and university leaders should & Make a concerted effort to know about MSP work on their campus and publicly recognize those faculty involved in it Ensure that STEM teaching and learning is a priority in the institutional strategic plan Position the preparation of K-12 teachers and support for K-12 education reform as a cross-campus responsibility H)Z>ZZZh(%Recommendations@College and university leaders should & Recognize the importance of their role in facilitating cross-disciplinary collaboration and their support of policies and structures that can sustain this work over time Create opportunities for career advancement and expanded leadership capacity among non tenure-track faculty, adjunct faculty, and non-faculty academic administrators who are proactively working with MSP .)ZxZRecommendations Higher education faculty and disciplinary societies should & Continue to seek and value linkages to the scholarship of teaching and learning within STEM disciplines Continue to build on the important service and outreach components of faculty work in MSP R?PPPPFor DiscussionWhere should a report like this go? How could these recommendations be moved forward in a way that they could have an impact on your campus? Are there other potential audiences for these recommendations? x$PPkPPAPPP r? q(